iOS 7 update traffic

• Subject: iOS 7 update traffic
• From: johns at sstar.com (John Souvestre)
• Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2013 15:36:43 -0500
• In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
• References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>

Hi Jared.

 > The attitude in this email I have encountered elsewhere.  Apple pays 
 > for bandwidth, customers pay for access. Not sure why their release 
 > strategy is so highly critiqued.

Because it impacts other, non-Apple customers.  Or, it costs the ISP more
(passed through to all customers) to add capacity to handle an infrequent peak
load.

Question/suggestion:  Could Apple perhaps shift their release to a Saturday
morning?  I would think that this would go a long way to diluting the peak.

John

??? John Souvestre - New Orleans LA - (504) 454-0899


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 6298 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/attachments/20130919/459eba5d/attachment-0001.bin>

• Follow-Ups:
  • iOS 7 update traffic
    • From: jared at puck.nether.net (Jared Mauch)

• References:
  • iOS 7 update traffic
    • From: fergdawgster at mykolab.com (Paul Ferguson)
  • iOS 7 update traffic
    • From: swmike at swm.pp.se (Mikael Abrahamsson)
  • iOS 7 update traffic
    • From: wbailey at satelliteintelligencegroup.com (Warren Bailey)
  • iOS 7 update traffic
    • From: jared at puck.nether.net (Jared Mauch)

• Prev by Date: car2.Detroit1.Level3.net
• Next by Date: iOS 7 update traffic
• Previous by thread: iOS 7 update traffic
• Next by thread: iOS 7 update traffic
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread