Fundamental questions of backbone design

• Subject: Fundamental questions of backbone design
• From: me at anuragbhatia.com (Anurag Bhatia)
• Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2013 16:17:44 +0530
• In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
• References: <CAJ0+aXbB3b-hBKA0oUyRedTAbcO8MWPtn+=kk8GEsZFO544HKg@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]>

Hi Valdis


Checkout routing table at NIXI and you will get idea what I am referring to
w.r.t. prepended routes.

http://www.nixi.in/lookingglass.php



Thanks!


On Sat, Oct 19, 2013 at 3:16 AM, <Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu> wrote:

> On Fri, 18 Oct 2013 23:33:16 +0530, Anurag Bhatia said:
>
> >    localpref to customer routes then peering and finally transit. Does
> this
> >    works well or you see issues with people who have 10+ prepends on some
> >    peering routes calling you to not send traffic via those circuits?
>
> OK. I admit being perplexed.  Under what conditions will somebody have that
> many prepends and you *still* end up routing via that path if you have
> another path available?
>
> I guess if they were silly and prepended themselves 10 times and then
> announced the result to the upstreams of *both* paths you have available...
>



-- 


Anurag Bhatia
anuragbhatia.com

Linkedin <http://in.linkedin.com/in/anuragbhatia21> |
Twitter<https://twitter.com/anurag_bhatia>
Skype: anuragbhatia.com

• References:
  • Fundamental questions of backbone design
    • From: me at anuragbhatia.com (Anurag Bhatia)
  • Fundamental questions of backbone design
    • From: Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu (Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu)

• Prev by Date: 80 Gbps ?
• Next by Date: Fundamental questions of backbone design
• Previous by thread: Fundamental questions of backbone design
• Next by thread: FTTH for cable companies
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread