Meraki

• Subject: Meraki
• From: jfbeam at gmail.com (Ricky Beam)
• Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2013 15:30:24 -0500
• In-reply-to: <CAL9jLaa3QxDB1X5ornoHqwrzGMP8LL++zy=u7kgYpHSokyYvKw@mail.gmail.com>
• References: <[email protected]> <7EF4A8B03B0A3A44858C8B42E0DB236A01232F9FBCC0@PHX-52N-EXM04A.lcc.usairways.com> <[email protected]> <CAL9jLaa3QxDB1X5ornoHqwrzGMP8LL++zy=u7kgYpHSokyYvKw@mail.gmail.com>

On Tue, 19 Nov 2013 16:36:42 -0500, Christopher Morrow  
<morrowc.lists at gmail.com> wrote:
> so you just decide: "How many may we have to deploy?"
> then schedule that many pitch meetings with them? :)

Heh. No.  It's not supposed to work like that.  They want a verifiable  
company for the free (cheapest, most basic) AP. And you (and the  
associated company) get one, and only one, freebee.

(As it's the basic 2.4Ghz model, I've been less motivated to get my  
schwag.)

• Follow-Ups:
  • Meraki
    • From: wbailey at satelliteintelligencegroup.com (Warren Bailey)

• References:
  • Meraki
    • From: gourmetcisco at hotmail.com (Hank Disuko)
  • Meraki
    • From: Sean.Pedersen at usairways.com (Pedersen, Sean)
  • Meraki
    • From: wbailey at satelliteintelligencegroup.com (Warren Bailey)
  • Meraki
    • From: morrowc.lists at gmail.com (Christopher Morrow)

• Prev by Date: Meraki
• Next by Date: NAT64 and matching identities
• Previous by thread: Meraki
• Next by thread: Meraki
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread