[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Automatic abuse reports
- Subject: Automatic abuse reports
- From: hmurray at megapathdsl.net (Hal Murray)
- Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2013 21:57:17 -0800
William Herrin <bill at herrin.us> said:
> That's the main problem: you can generate the report but if it's about
> some doofus in Dubai what are the odds of it doing any good?
It's much worse than that.
Several 500 pound gorillas expect you to jump through various hoops to report
abuse. Have you tried reporting a drop box to Yahoo or Google lately?
On top of that, many outfits big enough to own a CIDR block are outsourcing
their mail to Google. Google has a good spam filter. It's good enough to
reject spam reports to abuse@<hosted-by-google>
I wonder what would happen if RIRs required working abuse mailboxes. There
are two levels of "working". The first is doesn't bounce or get rejected
with a sensible reason. The second is actually gets acted upon.
If you were magically appointed big-shot in charge of everything, how long
would you let an ISP host a spammer's web site or DNS server or ...? What
about retail ISPs with zillions of zombied systems?
--
These are my opinions. I hate spam.