[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Verizon DSL moving to CGN
On Mon, 8 Apr 2013, Rajiv Asati (rajiva) wrote:
> Thankfully, MAP is not CGN. Correctly stated, unlike DS-Lite, MAP
> doesn't require any CGN that causes the SP network to put up with the
> NAT state. This means that all the subsequent issues of CGN/DS-Lite no
> longer apply.
For me as an operator, MAP is most likely going to be implemented in a
CGN-like box. Yes, it's stateless. Doesn't matter, I still need to flow
traffic through a dedicated box because MAP won't be implemented in my
regular routers (if you know otherwise, please speak up).
> MAP is all about stateless (NAT64 of Encapsulation) and IPv6 enabled
> access. MAP makes much more sense in any SP network having its internet
> customers do IPv4 address sharing and embrace IPv6.
It's still NAT.
Mikael Abrahamsson email: swmike at swm.pp.se