[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
AS 1668 BGP contact - possible prefix hijacking
- Subject: AS 1668 BGP contact - possible prefix hijacking
- From: brad.passwaters at gmail.com (Brad Passwaters)
- Date: Tue, 6 Nov 2012 09:27:24 -0500
- In-reply-to: <[email protected]om>
- References: <[email protected]om>
We don't believe there is prefix hijacking. Due to various legal and
contractual obligations there are certain questions you asked that
we just can not answer. However I have asked an engineer to sanitize our
internal audit and provide it to you.
Also I'll reach out to you later today by phone and make sure that it
answers your questions.
Brad Passwaters - Director Production Networks at Aol
(My Nanog participation predates my employment at Aol thus the use of a
On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 9:02 AM, Ben Bartsch <uwcableguy at gmail.com> wrote:
> Is there anyone here who can help us with a possible prefix hijacking
> situation through ATDN? Please contact me off list if you (or you know
> somebody) that can help us. I've tried the ATDN NOC and Vikas, but they
> have been no help whatsoever.
> The hijacked prefix appears to be sent to AS 1668, then propagated from
> AS 32440
brad.passwaters at gmail.com