[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
IPv6 Netowrk Device Numbering BP
On Sat, 2012-11-03 at 00:44 -0500, Randy wrote:
> Veering off this topic's course, Is there any issue with addresses like
> this ?
> 2001:470:1f00:1aa:abad:babe:8:beef < I have a bunch of these type
> 'addresses' configured for my various machines.
> I make it a point to come up with some sort of 'hex' speak address, what
> are peoples opinions on this?
I tell my students to avoid them. For several reasons:
- if you need to remember an IP address, you are doing it wrong
- limiting yourself to "word space" wastes "address space". Possibly
acceptable in interface IDs, foolish in subnetting bits.
- if people expect something, they will type it, possibly instead of
what's actually needed. By making them expect words, you introduce a
source of error.
- cultural sensitivity and plain good sense suggest that many words or
combinations might not be a good idea. How do your female techs feel
about "BAD:BABE"? Only marginally better than they feel about
"B16:B00B:EEZ", probably. Your markets in India, with its 900 million
Hindus, might take a dim view of "DEAD:BEEF". Etc.
- clever addresses are guessable addresses for scanners, and highly
identifiable in data as probably attached to high-value targets
- something that is witty once is generally irritating the thousandth
time you see it. Doubly so if it wasn't very funny to begin with.
- the time you spend trying to find something "meaningful" is basically
wasted, and the time you spend will increase exponentially once you've
used all the low-hanging fruit.
All in all, using such addresses is probably a Bad Idea.
Karl Auer (kauer at biplane.com.au)
GPG fingerprint: AE1D 4868 6420 AD9A A698 5251 1699 7B78 4EEE 6017
Old fingerprint: DA41 51B1 1481 16E1 F7E2 B2E9 3007 14ED 5736 F687