[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

NANOG List Update - Moving Forward

----- Original Message -----
> On Jul 12, 2011, at 8:46 PM, Larry J. Blunk wrote:
> > 
> >  I've have some concerns with AMS based on my experience
> > with the IETF mailing list.  It has had ongoing issues with
> > out-of-sequence delivery.  Based on the Received headers, it's
> > seems pretty clear the re-ordering is occurring internal to the
> > AMS servers.  It appears they may be trying something different
> > with the NANOG list as the IETF list does not employ bulk_mailer.
> ietf.org is mailman and postfix.

 Right, should have mentioned that.  Here's the Received headers
from a message yesterday that apparently had a 23 hour delay
internal to ietfa.amsl.org.  You can also see it is out of sequence in
the IETF mailing list archives.  There are some other recent emails
that were sent on July 8th and did not get delivered until Juth 11th.


Received: from mail.ietf.org ([])
  by sfpop-ironport04.merit.edu with ESMTP; 12 Jul 2011 11:06:29 -0400
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [])
	by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7027F21F8CB4;
	Tue, 12 Jul 2011 08:06:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: ietf at ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietf at ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [])
	by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4D7D21F8E58
	for <ietf at ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 Jul 2011 09:01:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([])
	by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id TAHKv2903pQw for <ietf at ietfa.amsl.com>;
	Mon, 11 Jul 2011 09:01:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nostrum.com (nostrum-pt.tunnel.tserv2.fmt.ipv6.he.net
	by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE6E321F8E4F
	for <ietf at ietf.org>; Mon, 11 Jul 2011 09:01:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dn3-227.estacado.net (vicuna-alt.estacado.net [])
	(authenticated bits=0)
	by nostrum.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id p6BG1O4H054438
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO);
	Mon, 11 Jul 2011 11:01:25 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from ben at nostrum.com)
Subject: Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-dnsext-rfc2672bis-dname-22
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084)
From: Ben Campbell <ben at nostrum.com>
In-Reply-To: <AE447DE4-CD85-4386-9C97-2008524D2402 at nist.gov>
Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2011 11:01:23 -0500
Message-Id: <5BB77043-1674-4FD6-87CB-17DDC1CEEC1C at nostrum.com>