[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Mac OS X 10.7, still no DHCPv6
> Dual stack isn't always the best approach. For networks that pass a
> large amount of traffic to a relatively small number of destinations,
> NAT64/DNS64 on a native v6 platform might be a better migration
> approach. If 90% of your traffic is v6, it is probably less trouble to
> use NAT64/DNS64 to reach that 10% than it is to dual-stack.
the scenario i think of here is the enterprise which wishes not to use
private space so deploys v6-only internally, and nat64 at the border to
a dual-stack provider.