[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

quietly....



On 14 feb 2011, at 6:46, Frank Bulk wrote:

> Requiring them to be on certain well known addresses is restrictive and
> creates an unnecessary digression from IPv4 practice.  It's comments like
> this that raise the hair on admins' necks.  At least mine.

I don't get this. Why spend cycles discovering a value that doesn't need to change?

But I lost this argument in the IETF years ago, so I guess I'm relatively alone here.