[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

IPv6 mistakes, was: Re: Looking for an IPv6 naysayer...



On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 6:07 AM, Arturo Servin <arturo.servin at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On 11 Feb 2011, at 04:51, Ricky Beam wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 11 Feb 2011 00:31:21 -0500, David Conrad <drc at virtualized.org> wrote:
>>> Amusingly enough, I personally (along with others) made arguments along these lines back in 1995 or so when the IAB was coming out with http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc1814.txt. ?Given the publication of 1814, you can probably guess how far those arguments fared.
>>
>> You missed the "anticipates external connectivity to the Internet" part. ?Networks that never touch the internet have RFC1918 address space to use. (and that works 99.999% of the time.)
>>
>
> ? ? ? ?Except in acquisitions and private peering.
>
> as

Especially during acquisitions, my $EMPLOYEER has made several
acquisitions recently and every one of them was wrought with painful
RFC1918 overlap problems.

Thanks,
Josh Smith
KD8HRX
email/jabber:? juicewvu at gmail.com
phone:? 304.237.9369(c)