[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: IPv6 status
- From: franck at genius.com (Franck Martin)
- Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2011 16:02:12 +1300 (FJST)
- In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
----- Original Message -----
> From: "Charles N Wyble" <charles at knownelement.com>
> To: nanog at nanog.org
> Sent: Thursday, 10 February, 2011 3:57:23 PM
> Subject: Re: IPv6 status
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> On 02/09/2011 06:35 PM, Franck Martin wrote:
> > Looking at the recent exchange on the list re IPv6, it seems we are
> > in the "whose fault is it?"
> > ? Denial (this isn't happening to me!)
> > ? Anger (why is this happening to me ?)
> > ? Bargaining (I promise I'll be a better person if ...)
> > ? Depression (I don't care anymore)
> > ? Acceptance ( I'm ready for whatever comes)
> > So I guess we progressed from last year which was denial!
> > Can we move on with the program and get to the bargaining phase?
> Isn't that CGNAT? :)
I have a friend, each time someone tells him "our gear is carrier grade", he asks them "Is it that bad?"
- IPv6 status
- From: charles at knownelement.com (Charles N Wyble)