[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Looking for an IPv6 naysayer...



Try looking for the expanded terms:

Large Scale NAT
Carrier Grade NAT
NAT444

Owen

On Feb 9, 2011, at 11:58 AM, david raistrick wrote:

> On Wed, 9 Feb 2011, Scott Helms wrote:
> 
>> For ISPs in this circumstance the choice will be CGNAT rather than IPv6 for a number of years because the cost is much lower and according to the vendors selling CGNAT solutions the impact to end users is (almost) unnoticeable.
> 
> Anyone care to define CGNAT?  Google results for this are either unrelated or "CGNAT will save us" or "CGNAT doesnt count" - no rfcs, no explainations, nothing....
> 
> 
> 
> --
> david raistrick        http://www.netmeister.org/news/learn2quote.html
> drais at icantclick.org             http://www.expita.com/nomime.html
>