[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Looking for an IPv6 naysayer...
- Subject: Looking for an IPv6 naysayer...
- From: bmanning at vacation.karoshi.com (bmanning at vacation.karoshi.com)
- Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2011 19:01:22 +0000
- In-reply-to: <[email protected].net>
- References: <[email protected].net>
i'm an IPv6 pragmatist. I've used IPv6 from its very beginings.
i am not a zelot, like so many are. IPv6 has its uses - but most of the
actual value in IPv6 has been stripped. for most practical, current use,
IPv4 will meet your needs now and for the forseeable future. NAT is your
IF (a big one) there are actual changes in regulatory models, transmission
models, and reduced dependence on centralized control, IPv6 has a chance to
shine and truely become the "next generation". Until then - same old, same old...
96 more bits - no majik.
On Wed, Feb 09, 2011 at 06:46:11PM +0000, Stephens, Josh wrote:
> Not something I'd typically use this list for but I have an opportunity to host a debate of sorts on IPv6 where I'm taking a very pro IPv6 stance and I need someone who wants to argue the other side - effectively that most people don't need to worry about it for a long time still or until someone makes them.
> Any takers feel free to ping me directly...