[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Weekend Gedankenexperiment - The Kill Switch
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 9:27 PM, Mark Newton <newton at internode.com.au>
> On 04/02/2011, at 3:43 PM, Paul Ferguson wrote:
>> On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 9:09 PM, Mark Newton <newton at internode.com.au>
>>> On 04/02/2011, at 2:13 PM, Jay Ashworth wrote:
>>>> An armed FBI special agent shows up at your facility and tells your
>>>> ranking manager to "shut down the Internet".
>>> Turn off the room lights, salute, and shout, "Mission Accomplished."
>>> The FBI dude with the gun won't know the difference.
>> No. The correct answer is that in the U.S., if the Agent in question has
>> a valid subpoena or N.S.L., you must comply.
> Subpoenas and NSLs are used to gather information, not to shut down
> telcos. They're just an enforceable request for records.
> Considering that politicians in the US have suggested that they need
> "kill switch" legislation passed before they can do it, and further
> considering that "kill switch" legislation doesn't currently exist,
> what lawful means do you anticipate an FBI special agent to rely on
> in making such a request?
> I'm not actually in the US. In a question arising from the Egypt
> demonstrations earlier this week, Australia's Communications Minister
> said he didn't think the law as written at the moment provided the
> government with the lawful ability to shut down telecommunications
I share your sentiment.
One of the best commentaries I have read lately on this issue was earlier
Worth a quick read.
- - ferg
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP Desktop 9.5.3 (Build 5003)
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
"Fergie", a.k.a. Paul Ferguson
?Engineering Architecture for the Internet
?ferg's tech blog: http://fergdawg.blogspot.com/