[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

And so it ends...



On Feb 3, 2011, at 12:07 PM, Benson Schliesser wrote:

> On Feb 3, 2011, at 10:57 AM, John Curran wrote:
> 
>> On Feb 3, 2011, at 11:51 AM, Benson Schliesser wrote:
>>>> Such transfers should be reported when noticed, so the resources can be reclaimed and reissued.
>>> 
>>> Is any RIR authorized, in a legal sense, to "reclaim" legacy address blocks that RIR didn't "issue"?  Without that legal authority, is any RIR prepared to accommodate the legal damages stemming from "reclamation"? (Does the RIR membership support such action, in the first place?)
>> 
>> Resources are listed in the ARIN WHOIS database, which is administered per policies established by the community in this region.
>> 
>> Short answer: there's no shortage of authority updating that database as long as the community wishes it so.
> 
> I respect the community-driven process and I respect that ARIN's role is to enforce community-developed policy.  From that perspective, thank you for your answer.
> 
> But that's only valid up to a point.  If the community declared overwhelmingly that ARIN should start clubbing random people over the head, I suspect your legal counsel would take issue with that policy and ARIN would refuse to enforce it.

Clubbing people over the head would not get adopted by the
policy progress, since legal review is part of the process.

Reclaiming addresses that are used contrary to policy process
is already part of the number resource policy in the ARIN region, 
has passed legal review, and has already been done on occasion.

> Of course this is only theoretical at the moment.  

Incorrect.  It's running code.
/John