[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- Subject: IPv6 Confusion
- From: thegameiam at yahoo.com (David Barak)
- Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 16:05:14 -0800 (PST)
- In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
If the IPv6 solutions are not going to be 'better' than v4, how about simply making sure that they are 'as good as' ipv4?
Right now, I'd be hard pressed to think of a v6 function which is 'better' and I can think of a lot which are 'not as good as.'
Adrian Chadd wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 19, 2009, Nathan Ward wrote:
>> Yep. You asked your vendors to support equivalent IPv6 things at the
>> time though, so when you roll out IPv6 the support is ready, right?
>> The point is that these deficiencies exist in IPv4, and I'm not sure
>> how you would solve them in IPv6 (assuming you can make all the
>> changes you want, and get instant industry-wide support) any better
>> than you solve them in IPv4.
> Who says the IPv6 solutions need to be better than IPv4?