[ih] NCP and TCP implementations

• Subject: [ih] NCP and TCP implementations
• From: jeanjour at comcast.net (John Day)
• Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2020 20:07:40 -0400
• In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
• References: <[email protected]om> <[email protected]om> <[email protected]om> <[email protected]> <[email protected]om> <[email protected]om> <[email protected]m> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>

cmd/response. It was symmetrical. It didn?t matter which came first.

Yea, that is what it was or seemed to be, but as a response to command line, it gave an entirely different impression.  ;-)

I always thought it was inspired humor.

> On Mar 10, 2020, at 17:43, Dave Crocker <dcrocker at bbiw.net> wrote:
> 
> On 3/10/2020 2:41 PM, John Day via Internet-history wrote:
>> (not can?t, won?t);-)
> 
> telnet option response.
> 
> d/
> 
> 
> -- 
> Dave Crocker
> Brandenburg InternetWorking
> bbiw.net

• References:
  • [ih] NCP and TCP implementations
    • From: vgcerf at gmail.com (vinton cerf)
  • [ih] NCP and TCP implementations
    • From: leo at vegoda.org (Leo Vegoda)
  • [ih] NCP and TCP implementations
    • From: steve at shinkuro.com (Steve Crocker)
  • [ih] NCP and TCP implementations
    • From: bernie at fantasyfarm.com (Bernie Cosell)
  • [ih] NCP and TCP implementations
    • From: steve at shinkuro.com (Steve Crocker)
  • [ih] NCP and TCP implementations
    • From: leo at vegoda.org (Leo Vegoda)
  • [ih] NCP and TCP implementations
    • From: bernie at fantasyfarm.com (Bernie Cosell)
  • [ih] NCP and TCP implementations
    • From: dhc at dcrocker.net (Dave Crocker)
  • [ih] NCP and TCP implementations
    • From: jeanjour at comcast.net (John Day)

• Prev by Date: [ih] NCP and TCP implementations
• Next by Date: [ih] NCP and TCP implementations
• Previous by thread: [ih] NCP and TCP implementations
• Next by thread: [ih] NCP and TCP implementations
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread