[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[ih] NCP and TCP implementations

Subject: [ih] NCP and TCP implementations
From: dhc at dcrocker.net (Dave Crocker)
Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2020 13:52:00 -0700
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]om> <[email protected]om> <[email protected]om> <[email protected]> <[email protected]om> <[email protected]om> <[email protected]>

On 3/10/2020 12:47 PM, Alex McKenzie via Internet-history wrote:
> which included "no rotating storage", which in those days was quite unreliable in a MTBF sense.

Indeed.? I recall ISI making the unusual decision to not use a 
high-speed swapping disk/drum and, instead, to just get a lot more (very 
expensive) main memory and then do the (less frequent) swapping from a 
regular (slower) disk.

d/

-- 
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
bbiw.net

References:
- [ih] NCP and TCP implementations
  - From: vgcerf at gmail.com (vinton cerf)
- [ih] NCP and TCP implementations
  - From: leo at vegoda.org (Leo Vegoda)
- [ih] NCP and TCP implementations
  - From: steve at shinkuro.com (Steve Crocker)
- [ih] NCP and TCP implementations
  - From: bernie at fantasyfarm.com (Bernie Cosell)
- [ih] NCP and TCP implementations
  - From: steve at shinkuro.com (Steve Crocker)
- [ih] NCP and TCP implementations
  - From: leo at vegoda.org (Leo Vegoda)
- [ih] NCP and TCP implementations
  - From: amckenzie3 at yahoo.com (Alex McKenzie)

Prev by Date: [ih] NCP and TCP implementations
Next by Date: [ih] NCP, TCP/IP question
Previous by thread: [ih] NCP and TCP implementations
Next by thread: [ih] NCP and TCP implementations
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread