[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[ih] 'Internet' vs 'internet'
- Subject: [ih] 'Internet' vs 'internet'
- From: touch at strayalpha.com (Joe Touch)
- Date: Mon, 1 Oct 2018 07:31:51 -0700
- In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
- References: <[email protected]>
Hi, Noel,
Agreed. Note some other issues I?ve seen:
"The Internet Protocol? (not Internet protocol or internet protocol), but ?the Internet?s protocols?
?IPsec?, not ?IPSec?, ?IPSEC?, or ?ipsec?
Agreed on the adjective issue as well - including titles (Internet evangelist, e.g.)
Joe
> On Oct 1, 2018, at 7:25 AM, Noel Chiappa <jnc at mercury.lcs.mit.edu> wrote:
>
>> From: Joe Touch <touch at strayalpha.com>
>
>> The AP and New York Times need educating on this issue too.
>
> I know some people at the NYW, let me ask them how to proceed.
>
>> At least one key issue, IMO, is that both variants have distinct meaning.
>
> This is a very significant point, one I hadn't clearly recognized. Let's see
> if it helps.
>
> BTW, reading up on this topic, apparently some places capitalize the thing,
> but not its use in adjectival form. I don't believe this is correct. One
> doesn't say 'white house hallway', it would (properly) be 'White House
> hallway'. And 'Internet hosts' has a different meaning (again) from 'internet
> hosts'.
>
> Noel