[ih] .UK vs .GB

• Subject: [ih] .UK vs .GB
• From: paf at frobbit.se (Patrik Fältström)
• Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2018 02:48:26 -0700
• In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
• References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <CA+CiqoUyGDkyZJrY=aeY_WXdco8g_Jcm=Zf694yPKPbELq8CQg@mail.gmail.com> <CA+CiqoU0=T9Hu=a1PqwYoKWhfTnyVV2toK2+dNPCEsJqf+UbjQ@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>

> On 14 Apr 2018, at 21:36, Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> I think I did once see a business card with an X.400 address (but
> certainly not from Denise or Ruediger, who had more sense.)

In Sweden X.400 was used by a few hardcore institutions.  It required Y2K problems to have Tele2/Swipnet turn off their admd and gateway to/from smtp.

   Patrik

• Follow-Ups:
  • [ih] .UK vs .GB
    • From: nigel at channelisles.net (Nigel Roberts)
  • [ih] .UK vs .GB
    • From: jklensin at gmail.com (John Klensin)

• References:
  • [ih] .UK vs .GB
    • From: johnl at iecc.com (John Levine)
  • [ih] .UK vs .GB
    • From: paf at frobbit.se (Patrik Fältström)
  • [ih] .UK vs .GB
    • From: eric.gade at gmail.com (Eric Gade)
  • [ih] .UK vs .GB
    • From: eric.gade at gmail.com (Eric Gade)
  • [ih] .UK vs .GB
    • From: paf at frobbit.se (Patrik Fältström)
  • [ih] .UK vs .GB
    • From: brian.e.carpenter at gmail.com (Brian E Carpenter)
  • [ih] .UK vs .GB
    • From: ocl at gih.com (Olivier MJ Crépin-Leblond)
  • [ih] .UK vs .GB
    • From: brian.e.carpenter at gmail.com (Brian E Carpenter)

• Prev by Date: [ih] .UK vs .GB
• Next by Date: [ih] Yasha Levine's Surveillance Valley: The Secret Military History of the Internet -- Some Questions
• Previous by thread: [ih] .UK vs .GB
• Next by thread: [ih] .UK vs .GB
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread