[ih] .UK vs .GB

• Subject: [ih] .UK vs .GB
• From: nigel at channelisles.net (Nigel Roberts)
• Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2018 10:14:07 +0100
• In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
• References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <CAGS=b9Dz1Wf4cf-esRPmjcAk4m2A8Ft_kBbG7PcOFFbb7pNy4A@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>

Actually, on re-reading this sentence and recalling the news last week, 
I appear to have unintentionally taken an overly Anglocentric view of 
this bit.

This should read "was only confirmed on its current borders in 1998".



> 1801. It lasted until 1922. So today's UK (which is the legal 
> successor-state in international law), is less than 100 years old, and 
> was only confirmed on its current borders in 1948-49.
> 

• References:
  • [ih] .UK vs .GB
    • From: nigel at channelisles.net (Nigel Roberts)
  • [ih] .UK vs .GB
    • From: johnl at iecc.com (John Levine)
  • [ih] .UK vs .GB
    • From: agoldmanster at gmail.com (Alexander Goldman)
  • [ih] .UK vs .GB
    • From: paf at frobbit.se (Patrik Fältström)
  • [ih] .UK vs .GB
    • From: nigel at channelisles.net (Nigel Roberts)

• Prev by Date: [ih] .UK vs .GB
• Next by Date: [ih] Yasha Levine's Surveillance Valley: The Secret Military History of the Internet -- Some Questions
• Previous by thread: [ih] .UK vs .GB
• Next by thread: [ih] .UK vs .GB
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread