[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Captive-portals] practicality of 511 HTTP status code
On 2017-06-23 20:11, Dave Dolson wrote:
It seems 511 is probably better than 30x for non-browser
requests—clearly an error instead of redirecting to something unexpected.
Is 511 likely to be OK for old IoT devices? Probably a better outcome
FWIW, why is *307* desirable in the first place? Wouldn't it be better
to use 301/302 or even 303?
Best regards, Julian