[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Captive-portals] [adoption call] draft-donnelly-capport-detection
+1 to adopting this document as the basis for the captive API.
> On Aug 30, 2017, at 7:23 PM, Dave Dolson <[email protected]> wrote:
> I support adopting the API document, expecting some changes to the details of the API itself, which I believe the authors also said they expected.
> David Dolson
> Original Message
> From: Erik Kline
> Sent: Wednesday, August 30, 2017 7:04 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Cc: [email protected]
> Subject: [Captive-portals] [adoption call] draft-donnelly-capport-detection
> As indicated in the minutes from Prague
> [https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/minutes-99-capport/], there was a
> general hum in favor of the API document:
> 4. API document: do we need a milestone? Humming: in favor.
> 5. Is this document a good basis. Humming in favor.
> This email is to initiate a two week call for adoption for:
> Feedback requested, even if only to restate an opinion expressed in Prague.
> Captive-portals mailing list
> [email protected]