Geek captcha

• Subject: Geek captcha
• From: juan.g71 at gmail.com (juan)
• Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2018 17:48:50 -0300
• In-reply-to: <CAMyHXXdc46m7Bhy+O+C4wSuZbqYcE3BpsbrxdVAng0s7tRuBAQ@mail.gmail.com>
• References: <CAMyHXXeqcURQcSpNJZ9Aq6MotVE7wOD2J23WyNbZnCeJ+Z8aMg@mail.gmail.com> <[email protected]$> <CAMyHXXdc46m7Bhy+O+C4wSuZbqYcE3BpsbrxdVAng0s7tRuBAQ@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, 16 Jul 2018 09:06:19 -0700
Steven Schear <schear.steve at gmail.com> wrote:

> I'm not sure but think the completion option should have been, "if none
> click SHIP".

	funnily enough that mock captcha (it's a joke Georgi...) may be more solvable than the garbage that  googlepentagon actually 'serves'. Their current captchas are just a bunch of small, blurry, noisy collections of random pixels.




> 
> On Mon, Jul 16, 2018, 8:55 AM Georgi Guninski <guninski at guninski.com> wrote:
> 
> > What is this code doing?
> > Looks like obfuscated javascript, not fully shown.
> >
> > On Sat, Jul 14, 2018 at 04:50:15PM -0700, Steven Schear wrote:
> > >
> >
> >
> >

• Follow-Ups:
  • Geek captcha
    • From: mirimir at riseup.net (Mirimir)

• References:
  • Geek captcha
    • From: schear.steve at gmail.com (Steven Schear)
  • Geek captcha
    • From: guninski at guninski.com (Georgi Guninski)
  • Geek captcha
    • From: schear.steve at gmail.com (Steven Schear)

• Prev by Date: Geek captcha
• Next by Date: Geek captcha
• Previous by thread: Geek captcha
• Next by thread: Geek captcha
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread