[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Robert De Niro and Autism – a Tragic Drama of Intimidation



Someone with a little knowledge of R/similar could visualize the decay
of cpunks much better than this, but here are some people who wrote
code/built things/were real cypherpunks, versus fucking Mr. "Autism and
Racial Strength" (first post 7/3/2014) over here with this thread and
Juan "You're just an agent of the American Fascists" Garofalo (first
post 9/09/2013)  with the follow-through:

 * Cathal Garvey (last post 10/16/2015)
 * Eugen Leitl (last post 10/26/2015)
 * Peter Gutmann (seems to only troll now, but still posts)
 * James A. Donald (last post 01/24/2016)
 * John Young still posts, but substantially less
And now we're left with the above two concern trolls and company who
never even sent email to al-qaeda.net.

It's an abject falsehood that raising the noise to totally drown out
any signal and alienating the entire rest of the list is somehow not
harmful to the list. 

Nobody who A.) has no concrete contribution to the community and/or B.)
never posted to al-qaeda.net has any business posting more than, say,
John Young. This isn't censorship, this is the continuity of the
community. Just because you CAN spam cpunks with autism and racial
strength doesn't mean it's necessarily cypherpunk to do so. 

Maybe submit to /r/DarkFuturology, guys? You'd probably get more
engagement.

On Sun, 2016-04-17 at 16:20 -0300, juan wrote:
> On Sun, 17 Apr 2016 11:24:39 -0700
> Shelley <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> > I generally
> > ignore this list because of the nonsensical mess a few of you have
> > made of it, which has driven off so many others as well. 
> 
> 
> 	It would be interesting to learn how many crypto-anarchists
> 	were driven off. On the other hand it's quite clear that some
> 	of the people who left were outright hostile to the fundamental
> 	and most basic tenet of cypherpunks : political anarchy.
> 
> 	Also, the fact that some people sometimes post off topic stuff
> 	doesn't prevent other people from posting on topic stuff does
> 	it? 
> 
> 
> > Back to
> > ignore mode.
> > 
> > -S
> > 
> > 
> > ----------
> > On April 17, 2016 10:42:50 AM  Ð?лекÑ?андÑ?  <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> > 
> > > > 2016-04-17 19:33 GMT+03:00 Shelley <[email protected]>:
> > > > > 
> > > > > Why do you persist in posting this OT bullshit on a
> > > > > cypherpunks
> > > > listserv?  Go find a subreddit to pollute with your shitposts.
> > > > > 
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > That's your own IMHO. You forgot to mention that.
> > > You've got thousands of people on this list. Not only you/a few
> > > more people who keep whining about "shitposts/ offtopic".
> > > 
> > > By the way, i never read any of your own "great/ONtopic" posts
> > > (not
> > > talking about comments).
> > 
> > 
> 
> 
-- 
Sent from Ubuntu

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://cpunks.org/pipermail/cypherpunks/attachments/20160419/5c10f280/attachment.sig>