[tor-talk] [Cryptography] Dark Web should really be called the Twilight Web

• To: [email protected]
• Subject: [tor-talk] [Cryptography] Dark Web should really be called the Twilight Web
• From: [email protected] (grarpamp)
• Date: Thu, 28 May 2015 12:50:28 -0400
• Cc: [email protected], "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
• In-reply-to: <CAOsGNSRyU5eYefsw7QQZ4srJBZAwq+cPA-HLy0D1R=43vDJsoQ@mail.gmail.com>
• References: <CAMm+Lwg5K2VudO_c3s=P0G0_MCN3aCOeuZ_FAaKRTYLKMzaVvA@mail.gmail.com> <CAD2Ti28xG7j6DzULAJNqdEVE30HLktO_MC8w0vRGOH4uUODz5w@mail.gmail.com> <CAOsGNSRyU5eYefsw7QQZ4srJBZAwq+cPA-HLy0D1R=43vDJsoQ@mail.gmail.com>

On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 2:08 AM, Zenaan Harkness <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 5/28/15, grarpamp <[email protected]> wrote:
>> to be taken other than filling your unused capacity with fill traffic.
>> No network to date appears to be developing or using that defense.
>
> I thought that was the main differentiator for I2P (as compared with TOR)??

Nope. As above.

• References:
  • [Cryptography] Dark Web should really be called the Twilight Web
    • From: [email protected] (grarpamp)
  • [tor-talk] [Cryptography] Dark Web should really be called the Twilight Web
    • From: [email protected] (Zenaan Harkness)

• Prev by Date: First they came for your multimedia...
• Next by Date: Privacy Centric Naming of Humans
• Previous by thread: [tor-talk] [Cryptography] Dark Web should really be called the Twilight Web
• Next by thread: [Cryptography] Dark Web should really be called the Twilight Web
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread