Crypto Projects that Might not Suck

• To: hellekin <[email protected]>
• Subject: Crypto Projects that Might not Suck
• From: [email protected] (Mike Ingle)
• Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2015 12:08:04 -0700
• Cc: [email protected]
• In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
• References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]>

How does one go about getting on this list? I think Confidant Mail 
qualifies. It uses GPG end to end, and encrypts the metadata in transit.

On 4/10/2015 6:44 AM, hellekin wrote:
> On 04/10/2015 03:59 AM, Seth wrote:
>   
>> https://github.com/sweis/crypto-might-not-suck/blob/master/README.md
>>
>>     
> *** When EFF launched the Secure Messaging Scoreboard, lynX and I were a
> bit pissed that they even mentioned proprietary solutions, so we made an
> alternate list:
>
> http://libreplanet.org/wiki/GNU/consensus/Secure_Messaging_Scoreboard
>
> ==
> hk
>
>   

• Follow-Ups:
  • Crypto Projects that Might not Suck
    • From: [email protected] (Cathal (Phone))
  • Crypto Projects that Might not Suck
    • From: [email protected] (rysiek)

• References:
  • Crypto Projects that Might not Suck
    • From: [email protected] (Seth)
  • Crypto Projects that Might not Suck
    • From: [email protected] (hellekin)

• Prev by Date: Stingrays & Hailstorms
• Next by Date: Crypto Projects that Might not Suck
• Previous by thread: Crypto Projects that Might not Suck
• Next by thread: Crypto Projects that Might not Suck
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread