FOIPA adventures

• To: cpunks <[email protected]>, "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
• Subject: FOIPA adventures
• From: [email protected] (coderman)
• Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2015 23:21:31 -0700
• In-reply-to: <CAJVRA1QtgMky_hsDLsmFwiXcxE528bZaDOQsjTqqj4tR-dbGBQ@mail.gmail.com>
• References: <CAJVRA1SaJpNaPQx=s_7VVM==ony2sH0aUG3w11cjNX6escSm8w@mail.gmail.com> <CAJVRA1TUfu40206TOzK2kBsgCvbgBYYXmyKZ3E5n4KQuoEtZyg@mail.gmail.com> <CAJVRA1QtgMky_hsDLsmFwiXcxE528bZaDOQsjTqqj4tR-dbGBQ@mail.gmail.com>

On 4/4/15, coderman <[email protected]> wrote:
> ...
> i am content to let PA req stay nonexistant;


this was best addressed as a separate, dedicated effort, after all :P
  https://www.muckrock.com/foi/united-states-of-america-10/foipa-17315/
    [ not even gonna embargo this one ... ]

coordinating DoJ-361 through MuckRock.com this time, and legal muscle
on retainer specialized in FOIA/PA for the next steps... let's
experiment with goal: no redactions; fight all omissions!

.
.
.

game theory says just one a compromise; potential for beneficial
resolution. yet negative sums as counter signal also apply... stay
tuned for onion site additions; SDRs and sensors see as well as thwart
:)

• References:
  • FOIPA adventures
    • From: [email protected] (coderman)
  • FOIPA adventures
    • From: [email protected] (coderman)

• Prev by Date: Greenwald, Scahill step down from The Intercept [kettle calls pot capitalist edition]
• Next by Date: Crypto Projects that Might not Suck
• Previous by thread: FOIPA adventures
• Next by thread: FOIPA adventures ending in "No record letter mailed"
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread