[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Vulns of social/freedom initiatives, NSA 0wn3d CPUs, BTC, Infra and Politic
- To: grarpamp <[email protected]>
- Subject: Vulns of social/freedom initiatives, NSA 0wn3d CPUs, BTC, Infra and Politic
- From: [email protected] (Lodewijk andré de la porte)
- Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2015 22:30:14 +0900
- Cc: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>, cryptography <[email protected]>
- In-reply-to: <CAD2Ti28jhdy7Nq3FBMafSSCMkJgbKQ1mFME0OapTQXyeqLk=0Q@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <CAD2Ti28jhdy7Nq3FBMafSSCMkJgbKQ1mFME0OapTQXyeqLk=0Q@mail.gmail.com>
I've been pondering Intel's chips for a while now. It was what made me
decide against making a Bitcoin wallet service. Since my decision a slew of
services inferior to what I had failed for various reasons. Can't say what
would've happened, if I had proceeded.
Is there any evidence for or against the Intel chip exploits? (Other than
"They could do it, and why wouldn't they?")
Is there any reason to expect AMD to be any better?
What about (certain?) ARM chips?
What about MediaTek?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://cpunks.org/pipermail/cypherpunks/attachments/20150409/73aab264/attachment.html>