[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Telegram vs. Unhandled Expression



Dnia wtorek, 25 lutego 2014 22:44:23 Ted Smith pisze:
> On Wed, 2014-02-26 at 02:54 +0100, rysiek wrote:
> > Dnia Å?roda, 26 lutego 2014 02:42:49 Lodewijk andré de la porte pisze:
> > > 2014-02-26 1:44 GMT+01:00 rysiek <[email protected]>:
> > > > Well, what kind of philantropist would start a UNIX alternative,
> > > > right? ;)
> > > 
> > > That's at least a kind that winds all his costs off on his university. A
> > > very understandable kind.
> > 
> > I have no idea how and where to the Telegram crew "winds" their costs. Nor
> > do I care, as long as the communication is secured even from their own
> > potential meddling.
> > 
> > So the question is: is it?
> 
> A contest isn't the way to show it:
> http://thoughtcrime.org/blog/telegram-crypto-challenge/

That is true.

-- 
Pozdr
rysiek
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 316 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://cpunks.org/pipermail/cypherpunks/attachments/20140226/98a9bfb7/attachment.sig>