[Cryptography] miniLock seems pretty interesting

• To: Thomas von Dein <[email protected]>, [email protected]
• Subject: [Cryptography] miniLock seems pretty interesting
• From: [email protected] (Stephan Neuhaus)
• Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2014 19:47:41 +0200
• In-reply-to: <20140813100515.GN11694@r4>
• References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <20140813100515.GN11694@r4>

On 2014-08-13, 12:05, Thomas von Dein wrote:
> So, now there are 5 different implementations for essentially the
> same thing:

And even if that were true (which it might well be, didn't check),
that's bad because...?  OpenSSL has a problem because (among other
things) there are no real competitors.  With more, and truly different
implementations, things *will* be different and they *might* be better.

Fun,

Stephan

• Follow-Ups:
  • [Cryptography] miniLock seems pretty interesting
    • From: [email protected] (Thomas von Dein)

• References:
  • [Cryptography] miniLock seems pretty interesting
    • From: [email protected] (Cathal Garvey)
  • [Cryptography] miniLock seems pretty interesting
    • From: [email protected] (Thomas von Dein)

• Prev by Date: [Cryptography] A post-spy world
• Next by Date: [Cryptography] miniLock seems pretty interesting
• Previous by thread: [Cryptography] miniLock seems pretty interesting
• Next by thread: [Cryptography] miniLock seems pretty interesting
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread