[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Fw: NSA good guys
[I didn't get a bounce off of CP the first time]
From: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
| Â Â Â It may be possible, in the not-so-distant-future, to record
| Â Â Â people in ultra high definition from a mile away, but the
| Â Â Â 'technology'Â can be rendered rather useless with somthing
| Â Â Â like...this
|
| Â Â Â http://ramitia.files.wordpress.com/2010/02/japan-face-masks.jpg
|
>At this time, it is possible to do facial recognition at 500 meters,
>iris recognition at 50 meters, and heartbeat recognition at 5 meters.
>A newspaper open on a table can be read from orbit.Â
I strongly doubt the part about reading the newspaper from orbit.  I don't doubt that the pattern of text and pictures on the  front page could be identified from orbit. ('Identifying the difference between Pravda and Izvestia'.)  An approximation I once heard is that a lens or mirror of about 4.5 inch in diameter can resolve an angle of one arc-second.  A mirror of the size of the Hubble Space Telescope (which I assume approximates that of the typical spy satellite today) is about 20x larger, so the resolution should be 20x better, or 1/20 arc-second.  That's 1/(57 degrees per radian)(3600arcseconds per degree)(20) = 1/4,100,000 radian.  From an altitude of 500 kilometers, that's about 1/8 of a meter, or 120 millimeter.  Maybe that's a pixel-pair, but it's far too large to resolve the text on a newspaper. Â
The best prospect to improve on this resolution would be to use a 'multiple-mirror-telescope' technology. Â Light-gathering capability isn't important in this application; high resolution is. Â Making a spy-telescope out of a few different mirrors, held precisely many meters apart, could conceivable achieve resolutions substantially greater than this.
    Jim Bell
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://cpunks.org/pipermail/cypherpunks/attachments/20140419/2aee71dc/attachment.html>