[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[cryptography] Which encryption chips are compromised?

To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Subject: [cryptography] Which encryption chips are compromised?
From: [email protected] (coderman)
Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2013 18:00:50 -0800
Cc: cpunks <[email protected]>, Crypto discussion list <[email protected]>, ianG <[email protected]>
In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]>

On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 4:11 PM,  <[email protected]> wrote:
>  >     * (TS//SI//REL TO USA, FVEY) Complete enabling for [XXXXXX]
>  > encryption chips used in Virtual Private Network and Web encryption
>  > devices. [CCP_00009].
>
> For this to be an explicit line item in that document, it
> has to be special.


unredacted:
https://peertech.org/dist/nsa-cpp-goals-FY2013-unredact.png

"Intel Ivy Bridge"

Follow-Ups:
- [cryptography] Which encryption chips are compromised?
  - From: [email protected] (coderman)

Prev by Date: Tradeoffs in Cyber Security
Next by Date: [cryptography] Which encryption chips are compromised?
Previous by thread: Fwd: [cryptography] Which encryption chips are compromised?
Next by thread: [cryptography] Which encryption chips are compromised?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread