Re: Cyanotype: Ag 41

From: Peter Marshall ^lt;[email protected]>
Date: 10/25/05-05:31:36 AM Z
Message-id: <435E1798.5040005@cix.co.uk>

David Lee uses the term to refer to art (and in this particular piece,
specifically photography, which he regards as its latest victim) that
"has become institutionalised by the short-sighted meddling and
control-freakery of galleries, curators and art colleges which ...
promote joyless pretentiousness to the exclusion of deeply rooted belief."

http://www.thejackdaw.co.uk/index.html may explain more about David Lee.

Regards,

Peter

Peter Marshall
petermarshall@cix.co.uk +44 (0)1784 456474
31 Budebury Rd, STAINES, Middx, TW18 2AZ, UK
_________________________________________________________________
My London Diary http://mylondondiary.co.uk/
London's Industrial Heritage: http://petermarshallphotos.co.uk/
The Buildings of London etc: http://londonphotographs.co.uk/
and elsewhere......

Judy Seigel wrote:

>
>
> On Fri, 21 Oct 2005, Peter Marshall wrote:
> ...>and a piece by critic David Lee on
>
>> how 'State Art' has taken over photography and removed the fun and
>> interest from it in which I found a great deal to agree with.
>
>
>
> What is "State Art"?
>
> J.
>
>
Received on Tue Oct 25 05:31:54 2005

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 11/07/05-09:46:19 AM Z CST