Re: Magnani Pescia et al.. for gumprinting

From: Hamish Stewart ^lt;[email protected]>
Date: 10/25/05-12:52:15 AM Z
Message-id: <BF8394B0.DB9B%hamish.stewart@gumphoto.demon.co.uk>

Katharine,

Thanks for the clarification - the paper I was referring to is the
traditional white.

Hamish Stewart Gum Bichromate Photographer - http://www.gumphoto.co.uk

> From: Katharine Thayer <kthayer@pacifier.com>
> Reply-To: alt-photo-process-l@sask.usask.ca
> Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2005 16:56:18 +0000
> To: alt-photo-process-l@sask.usask.ca
> Subject: Re: Magnani Pescia et al.. for gumprinting
>
> Hamish Stewart wrote:
>>
>> David,
>>
>> I would add to others comments regarding Fabriano Artisco. A good solid and
>> dependable paper. I find it is pretty consistent batch to batch. I have also
>> used saunders waterford in the past with success though had some consistency
>> problems recently.
>>
>
> Hi Hamish,
> Just for clarification, do you mean Fabriano Artistico Extra White, or
> Fabriano Artistico Traditional White? They are very different papers.
> Fabriano Artistico Traditional White is the paper that was always named
> just plain Fabriano Artistico; Fabriano Artistico Extra White is a new
> paper (3-4 years old?) that was marketed as a replacement Fabriano Uno.
> It was after the advent of this new paper also named Fabriano Artistico
> that the old Fabriano Artistico took on the "traditional white"
> qualifier to distinguish it from the new paper.
> Katharine
Received on Tue Oct 25 00:52:35 2005

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 11/07/05-09:46:19 AM Z CST