RE: Best CI for process

From: Sandy King ^lt;[email protected]>
Date: 10/01/05-10:02:37 PM Z
Message-id: <a06020406bf65075cb069@[192.168.2.2]>

Eric,

Density range (DR) and contrast index (CI) are closely related.

Read about it.

Sandy

>
>
> So a discussion of density range may be more appropriate than the CI for in
>camera negatives intended for use in platinum/palladium printing?
>
>
>
>Eric Neilsen Photography
>4101 Commerce Street
>Suite 9
>Dallas, TX 75226
>http://e.neilsen.home.att.net
>http://ericneilsenphotography.com
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Ryuji Suzuki [mailto:rs@silvergrain.org]
>> Sent: Saturday, October 01, 2005 7:19 PM
>> To: alt-photo-process-l@sask.usask.ca
>> Subject: Re: Best CI for process
>>
>> From: Richard Knoppow <dickburk@ix.netcom.com>
>> Subject: Re: Best CI for process
>> Date: Sat, 01 Oct 2005 16:36:06 -0700
>>
>> > Is it possible for you to post it on your web site
>> > perhaps as a PDF, I think it would be of considrable value.
>>
>> PDF papers are ideal in my view but I am reluctant to do this to my
>> photographic paper file. I'd rather mail a photocopy to someone in
>> serious, legitimate need of the information.
>>
>> Although I might not condemn anyone putting scans online quietly, I
>> probably don't want to know if my copy has anything to do with it.
Received on Sat Oct 1 22:02:58 2005

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 11/07/05-09:46:18 AM Z CST