Re: Gum problem(s)

From: Katharine Thayer ^lt;[email protected]>
Date: 11/20/05-11:20:55 AM Z
Message-id: <020E42B4-59EA-11DA-9E94-001124D9AC0A@pacifier.com>

On Nov 19, 2005, at 3:13 PM, Judy Seigel wrote:

>
> Not sure if I'm "the one" Katharine refers to, but I've been more
> annoyed than pleased by Kosar. For two reasons, firstly, NONE of it
> that I recall is his own testing, it's all "so and so" claims that
> thus and thus "seems likely" or "probably therefore" or "indicates,"
> "suggests," or "we thus conclude" and so forth. In other words at
> best it's a surmise at one remove... and don't we know better by now
> than to trust "tests" IN ANY MEDIUM where all variables are not
> controlled -- and all materials from the same source?
>

I knew there was one more thing I wanted to say: Since the information
in Kosar is taken from 170 different sources, this last sentence above
makes no sense.
kt
Received on Sun Nov 20 11:21:38 2005

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 12/01/05-02:04:50 PM Z CST