Re: Comments please?

From: Jack Brubaker ^lt;[email protected]>
Date: 01/10/04-07:02:08 AM Z
Message-id: <C5C3B.12744%jack@jackbrubaker.com>

Kate,

Just saw your gum prints and must compliment you on both the images and the
printing itself. I really liked the gum body detail prints. They embody what
I like best about gum prints, they are both soft tonally and crisp in
details, while having a lovely warmth of color that communicates the subject
without slavishly duplicating "real color". Congratulations! I'd love to see
them in person. I viewed them on my Mac Powerbook which is sensitive to the
angle of view and enjoyed tipping the screen back to further saturate the
color and up the contrast. They were wonderful both ways.

Jack

> From: Kate M <kateb@paradise.net.nz>
> Reply-To: alt-photo-process-l@skyway.usask.ca
> Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2005 23:14:00 +1200
> To: alt-photo-process-l@skyway.usask.ca
> Subject: RE: Comments please?
>
> Hi Katherine, thanks for the feedback. These are part of my master's
> work (ongoing). Yes, perhaps the 1/2 should read 1 of 2. This is a way
> the Aussies have of categorising prints that have no exact duplicates,
> but are part of a quasi-edition. Good, not good????
> I'd like to see yours when you have it scanned.
> Cheers
> Kate
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Katharine Thayer [mailto:kthayer@pacifier.com]
> Sent: Friday, 22 July 2005 9:55 a.m.
> To: alt-photo-process-l@sask.usask.ca
> Subject: Re: Comments please?
>
>
> Kate M wrote:
>>
>> Hi, I've just posted some new images on my site
>> http://www.katemahoneyphoto.co.nz/Close2u_intro.htm
>> I would like some feedback - any comments gracefully and gratefully
>> accepted :)
>>
>
> I like 'em, Kate.
>
> It looks like we're on some kind of parallel path, because I'm doing a
> series based on a similar kind of idea. Mine are 10-minute pinhole
> exposures, so much blurrier and no detail, and not quite as close up,
> and printed rather low-key and low-contrast, so the approaches are quite
> different. The only similarity, I guess, is that mine are also sort of
> ambiguous compositions based on the body. I've got one here in front of
> me to scan, maybe I'll do that for comparison. Anyway, I like what
> you're doing.
>
> But I'm confused what is meant by "Unique State print, 1/2" ?
>
> Katharine
>
> --
> Internal Virus Database is out-of-date.
> Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
> Version: 7.0.323 / Virus Database: 267.8.16/50 - Release Date:
> 15/07/2005
>
>
> --
> Internal Virus Database is out-of-date.
> Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
> Version: 7.0.323 / Virus Database: 267.8.16/50 - Release Date:
> 15/07/2005
>
Received on Sun Jul 24 20:10:03 2005

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 08/25/05-05:31:52 PM Z CST