RE: RIP kwik-print?

From: Kate M ^lt;[email protected]>
Date: 01/24/05-02:38:30 PM Z
Message-id: <000f01c50254$aeac19f0$d435f6d2@kateiwpiarptn6>

Hi Christopher, I would be thinking temperaprint if I were you! It uses
yupo synthetic paper. Have a look at the archives back about 6 weeks and
I think you'll find a bit of discussion about it. I'm also sending you
Helena Cleary's article in a separate personal mail (no attachments
allowed on the list). Although a bit trickier than quikprint, it
probably shares more characteristics than gum. Tonally it is easier to
achieve density. I believe the size of print is limited only by the size
of the negative and paper :)


No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.300 / Virus Database: 265.7.2 - Release Date: 21/01/2005
Received on Mon Jan 24 14:38:59 2005

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 02/01/05-09:28:09 AM Z CST