Re: Bad Martha

From: Michael Healy ^lt;>
Date: 01/23/05-01:29:41 AM Z
Message-id: <41F2EFF5.6509.AA80F7B@localhost>

A lot of snow, eh. You're a poor landscape photographer, then? Certainly no fun, is it,
living where, in Buffalo?

On 22 Jan 2005 at 22:17, wrote:

Date sent: Sat, 22 Jan 2005 22:17:15 -0500 (EST)
Subject: Re: Bad Martha
Send reply to:

> As to a discussion of Martha Stewart being off-topic...I beg to
> differ!
> I have consulted the index volume to Martha Stewart Living Magazine
> 1990-1999 and listed under "sunprints" is a reference to the May 1997
> issue, page 51. (I thought that I remembered an article on
> cyanotypes somewhere back there.)
> The volume in question is not immediately available to me as it has
> been stored in the special fireproof and blastproof archive area down
> in my cellar so that the wisdom of Martha may be kept safe in the
> event of any unfortunate catastrophe that might befall civilization
> and which will necessitate the rebuilding of a tasteful and
> well-organized way of life in the aftermath.
> It is, as we say, a good thing.
> best
> argon
Received on Sun Jan 23 01:31:01 2005

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 02/01/05-09:28:09 AM Z CST