RE: (Gum) Multi prints???

From: Loris Medici ^lt;[email protected]>
Date: 12/13/05-05:05:14 AM Z
Message-id: <003f01c5ffd5$186ed200$f402500a@altinyildiz.boyner>

My understanding is: "Because you can't get acceptable dmax without
using a very high contrast (heavily pigmented) emulsion, and when you
print with such an emulsion you have to use a very low contrast negative
- which will cause loss of local contrast and delicate tonal gradations
+ increase the risk of flaking, giving you a grainy print".

BTW, here's my question: I plan to print duo-pigment gums, a bluish dark
gray (Schmincke Neutral Gray #785, PR251 + PB60 + PG7) for shadowns and
a reddish brown (Schmincke Madder Brown #670, PR206) for highlights. I
will print using digital negatives. Is there any way I can use
Photoshop's Duotone image mode in order to design/predict the results
and design curves/negatives giving that particular look in my monitor?

TIA,
Loris.

-----Original Message-----
From: Yves Gauvreau [mailto:gauvreau-yves@sympatico.ca]
Sent: 13 Aralęk 2005 Salę 00:05
To: alt-photo-process-l@sask.usask.ca
Subject: (Gum) Multi prints???

Hi,

Lets begin by saying I'm assuming monochrome (single pigment) gum
prints.

Pratically all the text I've been reading suggest about 3 exposures to
get a "decent" monochrome gum print. One thing none of these text
mention, is what kind of negative they usually start with??? (though
some said they prefer a negative with a low density range)

I can't understand why, using a negative especially prepared for gum
prints, one would require multiple exposure to get the wanted result???

I simply don't get it, though I'm sure it works fine and that many fine
prints have been done that way in the past. But today with computer we
can control the value of each pixels almost at will. I don't see how
multiple exposure can even come close to that level of control, there is
just no way.

Thanks
Yves
Received on Tue Dec 13 07:41:14 2005

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 01/05/06-01:45:10 PM Z CST