Re: Ultrafine Clear Film and Epson 2200

From: Jon Lybrook ^lt;[email protected]>
Date: 10/23/04-04:23:21 AM Z
Message-id: <200410231023.i9NANLmR027868@terabear.com>

Thanks Loris - 3 or more transparencies per image certainly would add up!

Glad to hear the Photo Warehouse stock is working out.

Jon

On 10/23/2004, "Loris Medici" <loris_medici@mynet.com> wrote:

>Hi Jon,
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Jon Lybrook" <jon@terabear.com>
>To: <alt-photo-process-l@sask.usask.ca>
>Sent: Saturday, October 23, 2004 9:54 AM
>Subject: RE: Ultrafine Clear Film and Epson 2200
>
>
>> Sorry, I've been not following the thread closely. Why are we trying to
>> find something every bit as good as Pictorico when there is still
>> Pictorico (and AccuArt2 as it is now being called on the roll)?
>
>Because of the considerable cost difference (especially for tri-color gum
>printers). Why pay more if you can equally print - albeit w/quirks for some
>people - for 1/3 price? For me (Piezotone - a 3rd party quadblack pigment
>inkset - user) PW is even better, because it doesn't smear and scratch as
>easily as with Pictorico (which does so even a month later).
>
>
>
Received on Sat Oct 23 04:24:58 2004

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 11/03/04-10:51:23 AM Z CST