Re: Judy Seigel Ruined My Day!

From: terry lindquist ^lt;[email protected]>
Date: 05/15/04-08:09:16 PM Z
Message-id: <>


Should I have received my copy of #9 by now? (Saturday)

Thank you.

terry (lindquist)
227 chestnut street
fredonia, new york 14063

On Saturday, May 15, 2004, at 19:26 US/Eastern, Judy Seigel wrote:

> I'm trying to think of a way to explain how thrilled I am to have had
> this
> effect, which suggests that at least some of the material in #9 was as
> compelling & seductive to at least some folks as it seemed to me,
> while at
> the same time not give the impression that I am an unsympathetic
> person,
> or worse yet, narcissistically oblivious to the suffering of others.
> When
> I think of something suitably self-deprecating, I'll send it along,
> meanwhile it occurs to me that these complaints do prove the
> superiority,
> for the purpose of a "magazine," of print over online publication.
> There
> is no way on this earth you can blame a day lost to an online
> "magazine"
> on a morning surprise from the mailman !
> For that insight, as well as the list of seductions, I thank Mark and
> John
> especially. Somehow I'd thought folks were most interested in
> technical/how to -- and the anecdotal (gossipy?) was to please myself.
> Glad to have been of service.
> Judy
Received on Sat May 15 19:55:32 2004

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 06/04/04-01:20:53 PM Z CST