RE: Question(s) for Ziatype practitioners

From: Loris Medici ^lt;[email protected]>
Date: 07/27/04-02:44:34 AM Z
Message-id: <001b01c473b5$f2da8ae0$ce02500a@altinyildiz.boyner>

Well, the version in B&S site is better to me. A matter of taste I guess

Are you using a Macintosh? I'm using a PC... Perhaps the image in B&S
looks washed out to you when compared to the image in Weese's website
(Gamma 1.8 - 2.2 difference?). To me, the image B&S is better in shadow
detail. Also, the version in the Weese site looks too grainy, shadows
are blocked (no detail in darkest part of the tree trunks) and contrast
is considerably higher - I mean when compared to the version in B&S
site; not that I'm trashing it - that one is beatiful too...

Anyway, thank you very much for your last answer (many tips)!


> -----Original Message-----
> From: nze christian []
> Sent: Tuesday, July 27, 2004 10:49 AM
> To:
> Subject: RE: Question(s) for Ziatype practitioners
> Loris
> you should check the Carl Weese web page where the print look totaly
> different (better) compare to the B&S page
Received on Tue Jul 27 02:39:38 2004

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 08/13/04-09:01:12 AM Z CST