Re: CMYK separations: a correction

From: Sandy King ^lt;[email protected]>
Date: 12/18/04-04:49:40 PM Z
Message-id: <a06020415bdea62667566@[]>

Katharine Thaye wrote:

>Thanks for suggestions and patience
>while I figured this out,

If only he did not make pictures of naked women I
would support canonization of our beloved Mark
Nelson as St. Mark the Patient. Would it not be
wonderful for Mark to wind up in the same
heavenly abode where reside Santa Teresa de
Jesus, San Juan de la Cruz, and Mother Teresa
(already Santa Teresa, no?)

Gee, wonder if he would try to photograph them "en cuero" ?


> wrote:
>> Katherine,
>> Can you repeat the results? If not, and you get the appropriate
>> results with the workflow that makes sense to you, then I wouldn't
>> worry about it. We all occasionally get results from out in left
>> field, and it usually is something we absent-mindedly do, some setting
>> that is weird and we don't notice. I've had this happen with the
>> Epson Printer Driver, thinking that a certain saved setting will
>> repeat automatically and it doesn't, resulting in a negative that
>> doesn't print as predicted.
>> Mark
>> In a message dated 12/18/04 2:34:45 AM, writes:
>> Okay, I believe you, but if so, then what is this other
>> thing that could
>> logically be causing this? I'm quite willing to believe it's
>> something
>> unbelievably stupid I'm doing, but I'd be happy anyway just
>> to know what
>> it is
>> Katharine
>> Mark Nelson
>> Purchase the eBook & System for Your Own Custom Workflow@
>> Precision Digital Negatives
>> PDN's Own 31-Step Tablet Now Availableâ*”produced by Stouffer
>> Industries
>> Credit Card & Paypal now accepted
>> Workshop info on Home Page
Received on Sat Dec 18 16:50:01 2004

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 01/03/05-09:29:44 AM Z CST