Re: CMYK separations: a correction

From: Katharine Thayer ^lt;[email protected]>
Date: 12/17/04-04:31:18 PM Z
Message-id: <41C35E24.50F4@pacifier.com>

Jason DeFontes wrote:
>
> Katharine,
>
> I have no doubt that you are seeing the results you describe, but that is
> not what happens for me. As was previously stated, there is no reason (in
> theory) that the size of the image would have any effect on the results of
> the separations (other than, obviously, their size). I just tested with a
> couple of images at several sizes/resolutions ranging from very large to
> very small, and the separations were identical every time. Perhaps there is
> some other aspect of your workflow that is causing this?

Hmm, like what? I'm open to suggestions, but I can't think of anything
that would explain why I can toggle between the two kinds of separations
I posted today, simply by changing the size of the image that I send to
CMYK.
kt
Received on Sat Dec 18 00:27:16 2004

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : 01/03/05-09:29:44 AM Z CST