[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[ale] the _REAL_REASON_ for the admin change
Aggression is a good thing, these days, when trying to thwart spam.
No DNSBL is perfect, but most are reasonable.
On 2/20/08, Bob Toxen <transam at verysecurelinux.com> wrote:
> I find sorbs.net to be too aggressive.
> Bob Toxen
> bob at verysecurelinux.com [Please use for email to me]
> http://www.verysecurelinux.com [Network&Linux security consulting]
> http://www.realworldlinuxsecurity.com [My book:"Real World Linux Security
> Quality spam and virus filters.
> Quality Linux & UNIX security and SysAdmin & software consulting since 1990.
> "Microsoft: Unsafe at any clock speed!"
> -- Bob Toxen 10/03/2002
> On Wed, Feb 20, 2008 at 12:16:14AM -0500, Jim Popovitch wrote:
> > 2008/2/20 Jim Kinney <jim.kinney at gmail.com>:
> > > Clearly, spamassassin needs some tuning on the new server.
> > spamassassin should be at least the 3rd level protection, after
> > ClamAV. First line should be DNSBLs at the MTA.
> > Add these to sendmail.mc and recompile it:
> > FEATURE(`enhdnsbl', `dnsbl-1.uceprotect.net', `Rejected by DNSBL')dnl
> > FEATURE(`enhdnsbl', `dnsbl-2.uceprotect.net', `Rejected by DNSBL')dnl
> > FEATURE(`enhdnsbl', `zen.spamhaus.org', `Rejected by DNSBL')dnl
> > FEATURE(`enhdnsbl', `dnsbl.sorbs.net', `Rejected by DNSBL')dnl
> > -Jim P.
> > _______________________________________________
> > Ale mailing list
> > Ale at ale.org
> > http://mail.ale.org/mailman/listinfo/ale
> Ale mailing list
> Ale at ale.org