[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[ale]OT It begins...
On Thursday 29 January 2004 22:08, Jim Popovitch wrote:
> On Thu, 2004-01-29 at 22:54, ChangingLINKS.com wrote:
> > The fact that I could do this manually supports the argument that at least
> > some slogging goes on.
> No it doesn't, and that assertion convinces me that you are just
> learning as you go through this.
Ok, so I don't know anything about spamming, slogging programs don't exist,
and whatever you are proposing happened happened. This time, you are
> How do you come to the conclusion that
> ANY of those email addys come from "slogging", or for that matter
> "blogging", "clogging", or "frogging"? ;)
> -Jim P.
Ok, you are so funny and l33t. Right on time!
I would ask you to show me where the email addresses came from, ask you to
prove that they did NOT come from slogging (even though I showed *how* it is
possible and offered several alternative origins), or I would ask you AGAIN
to say what you believed happened, but . . . I realized I'd be wasting my
1. Whatever your assertion is about the origin of the list is correct.
2. I declare you the "winner" of whatever you wanted to win.
3. Your jokes *are* funny to some, great job?!
Oh, I *think* remember:
Aren't you the spam expert who recently threatened to "pull out their
credentials" regarding spam prevention?
Your perceived spamfighting credentials are hereby honored.
Could you do us a favor and offer a solution, please
(if not for the global spam problem, then just for our mailing list)?
This just in:
"Several folks have offered to step up and help remove email addresses from
the messages in the archives. I think that is a fantastic idea!"
There was that one expert who disagreed . . . .
Wishing you Happiness, Joy and Laughter,