[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[ale] SSSCA rears its (ugly) head once more
- Subject: [ale] SSSCA rears its (ugly) head once more
- From: swillms at mail.sis.pitt.edu (Swantje Willms)
- Date: Fri, 1 Mar 2002 16:55:05 -0500 (EST)
I'm not sure I even understand what is involved. The copying of what does
this scheme protect?
The content of the drive? - That wouldn't make sense, because it would
make backups of data impossible...
(Certain) software? - That has nothing to do with the drive, really. It
can be supplied by the software if desired.
Can someone explain this copy-protection scheme thing?
On Fri, 1 Mar 2002, George Johnson wrote:
> This scares me too!! This is why I am not a republi-crat or demo-cian. I
> would not be the person you are looking for to give any speach on this but I
> can give some sites where you can keep an eye on things like this that the
> main stream media will not report.
> Keep an eye out on these sites. You will find all kinds of interesting and
> scary news items here.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: James P. Kinney III [mailto:jkinney at localnetsolutions.com]
> Sent: Friday, March 01, 2002 3:35 PM
> To: Charles Shapiro
> Cc: Atlanta Linux User Group (E-mail)
> Subject: Re: [ale] SSSCA rears its (ugly) head once more
> It really scares the crap out of me to think that at some point in the
> nearing future, all of the stuff I use, all Open Source, could be
> outlawed for failing to comply with crap like this.
> On Fri, 2002-03-01 at 13:51, Charles Shapiro wrote:
> > If you haven't heard of it, the SSSCA (Security Systems Standards
> > Certification Act) would mandate that all new hard drives contain an
> > as-yet-undecided copy-protection scheme. Buying or selling a new drive
> > which was not so crippled would be a crime. It would also be a crime
> > to tamper with the copy-protection hardware or software on a disk drive.
> > Up to a half-million dollar fine or five years in jail for the first
> > offfense. This ain't law yet, but the time to act is now.
> > "When Congress sits idly by in the face of these activities, we
> > essentially sanction the Internet as a haven for thievery"
> > Fritz Hollings (D-SC) Feb 28, 2002 (hearings re the SSSCA)
> > Uh, maybe it's time to do an ALE meeting on "Progress toward outlawing
> > Open Source". Congress is really starting to scare me here. Any lawyers
> > or politicos in the house? I'd be glad to help out, but I don't really
> > feel qualified to do a full presentation.
> > -- CHS
> > ---
> > This message has been sent through the ALE general discussion list.
> > See http://www.ale.org/mailing-lists.shtml for more info. Problems should
> > sent to listmaster at ale dot org.
> James P. Kinney III \Changing the mobile computing world/
> President and COO \ one Linux user /
> Local Net Solutions,LLC \ at a time. /
> 770-493-8244 \.___________________________./
> GPG ID: 829C6CA7 James P. Kinney III (M.S. Physics)
> <jkinney at localnetsolutions.com>
> Fingerprint = 3C9E 6366 54FC A3FE BA4D 0659 6190 ADC3 829C 6CA7
> This message has been sent through the ALE general discussion list.
> See http://www.ale.org/mailing-lists.shtml for more info. Problems should be
> sent to listmaster at ale dot org.
This message has been sent through the ALE general discussion list.
See http://www.ale.org/mailing-lists.shtml for more info. Problems should be
sent to listmaster at ale dot org.